Talk:Alliance: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(→Pact treaty example: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[User:Rockhound]] 27.09.2010 00:18 ( Gmt+1) | [[User:Rockhound]] 27.09.2010 00:18 ( Gmt+1) | ||
== Pact treaty example == | |||
When two alliances form a pact (NAP, Ally, etc) is it customary to document some agreement between them and to set out the gives and gets of that pact? | |||
Assuming yes, then could an example of a successful treaty be described here? ''... or at least a boiler-plate treaty for new pacts to use.''<br />[[User:Najevi|Najevi]] 09:19, 11 October 2010 (CEST) | |||
Revision as of 07:19, 11 October 2010
Notice
If you would like to request a change to a help file, please post the suggested code here. I will not read every individual discussion page, however I shall try to monitor this page.
Thanks, Diggo11 ~ Wiki Admin 09:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Discussion
I whould like to point out that friendly alliance colours can be be changed so it doesnt necessarly mean friendlys are green and enemies are red , i think that should be made clear ( although those are the default colours .
User:Rockhound 27.09.2010 00:18 ( Gmt+1)
Pact treaty example
When two alliances form a pact (NAP, Ally, etc) is it customary to document some agreement between them and to set out the gives and gets of that pact?
Assuming yes, then could an example of a successful treaty be described here? ... or at least a boiler-plate treaty for new pacts to use.
Najevi 09:19, 11 October 2010 (CEST)